Skip to content
The reference academic journal by and for the Asia-Pacific interventional cardiology community
AsiaIntervention

AsiaIntervention

  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • How to submit
    • Authors guidelines
    • Submit your paper
  • Services
    • Advertising
    • Article reprints
    • Publication calendar
    • Rights & Permissions
  • About the journal
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Masthead
  • Contact us
Volume 7 – Number 2 – December 2021

Dependence on permanent pacemakers inserted after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: predictive factors in a ten-year retrospective analysis

AsiaIntervention 2021;7:98-102 | 10.4244/AIJ-D-21-00020

Lance Ng1, MBChB; Rajesh K Nair1, MBBS, MRCP, FRACP; Faeez Mohamad Ali1, MBBS, MD, MRCP, DM; Sanjeevan Pasupati1, MBChB, FRACP

1. Waikato Cardiology Department, Waikato Hospital, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand

Abstract

Aims: The requirement for a permanent pacemaker (PPM) is an important sequela after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this analysis was to identify predictive factors for pacemaker dependence in PPM-insertions post-TAVI.

Methods and results: A retrospective analysis of all PPM insertions done between January 2009 and December 2018 (n=1,373) identified 33 patients who received a PPM within one month of TAVI. Thirty-two had completed a PPM check at one year and were included in the final analyses. Of those who had PPM insertions after TAVI, 41% (13/32) were not PPM-dependent at one year. This cohort was predominantly European (94%) and over half were octogenerians (56%). Statistically significant associations with being PPM-dependent at one year include intraoperative PPM dependence (OR 5.714 [95% CI: 1.163-28.070]; p=0.032), third-degree heart block being the indication for PPM insertion (OR 8.533 [95% CI: 1.616-45.063]; p=0.012) and mean valve depth over 6.0 mm (OR 6.222 [95% CI: 1.200-32.273]; p=0.030).

Conclusions: A significant number of patients are not dependent on the PPMs inserted after TAVI. Although small, our study suggests that those who are pacing-dependent intraoperatively, have a third-degree heart block as their PPM indication or have a mean valve depth of over 6.0 mm, are more likely to be pacing-dependent in the long term. Larger studies are required to draw more definitive conclusions.

Abbreviations

  • ANZACS-QI: All New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement
  • AV: atrioventricular
  • ECG: electrocardiogram
  • ICD: implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • LAFB: left anterior fascicular block
  • LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction
  • LVOT: left ventricular outflow tract
  • PPM: permanent pacemaker
  • RBBB: right bundle branch block
  • RV: right ventricle
  • RVOT: right ventricular outflow tract
  • TAVI: transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Introduction

Permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement is an important sequela after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as it is associated with increased length of stay, increased cost of care and increased readmission rates1,2. There is conflicting evidence regarding the association between post-TAVI PPM requirement and mortality1,2,3,4. As the indications for TAVI expand to a younger, less comorbid cohort, the ramifications of having an additional device in situ long-term increase.

The aims of this retrospective analysis were to assess PPM dependence at one year and then to assess for any variables which may be predictive of PPM dependence at one year. We sought to assess PPM dependence at one year as a number of studies have suggested that up to half of those with PPMs inserted within 30 days post-TAVI are no longer dependent on their PPM at one year5,6. Moreover, gaining a better understanding of the determinants for dependence at one year may help delineate those whose conducting systems are possibly more likely to recover (and not be PPM dependent) and those whose conducting systems are less likely to recover (and be PPM dependent).

Methods

We used the All New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement (ANZACS-QI) Device Database to identify all PPM insertions performed at Waikato Hospital in the 10-year interval between January 2009 and December 2018.

The ANZACS-QI Device Database is a web-based electronic database which captures a gamut of variables on each device implantation (PPM and implantable cardioverter defibrillators [ICDs]) performed in New Zealand’s public hospitals. The specifics regarding data flow and management and data outputs have been previously described7.

Of 1,373 patients who had PPM insertions at our institution in the pre-specified ten-year period, 33 had TAVI in the month prior to their PPM insertion. Of those, 32 received a PPM device interrogation at one year and were included in the final analyses. In the same time period, there were 344 TAVIs implanted at our institution.

PPM dependence was defined as having either (i) no escape rhythm when pacing rate lowered to 30 beats per minute, (ii) symptoms before pacing rate lowered to 30 beats per minute or (iii) a rhythm with a class I indication for pacing (for example, complete heart block or second-degree Mobitz II heart block).

Statistical analyses for odds ratios for predictors of PPM dependence were undertaken using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software).

Results

BASELINE DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

The demography in the analysed sample is in keeping with the known demographic profile of those with severe aortic stenosis in New Zealand whereby the incidence per 100,000 is markedly higher in the octogenarian group. This being said, although Ministry of Health data suggests a 2.5:1 incidence of aortic stenosis mortality between non-Maori and Maori, respectively, our cohort is disproportionately non-Maori (96.9%)8.

BASELINE STRUCTURAL-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS

From a structural perspective, 68.8% had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 50% and over two thirds had a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter greater than 2.1 cm. CoreValve® (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Evolut™ R (Medtronic) made up almost 70% (22/32) of the valves implanted. Other valves utilised included: Hydra (n=1, Vascular Innovations Co., Nonthaburi, Thailand), Jena (n=1, JenaValve Technology, Munich, Germany), Lotus™ (n=5, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), SAPIEN XT (n=1, Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) and SAPIEN 3 (n=2, Edwards Lifesciences). A valve size of greater than 26 mm occurred in 68.8% (22/32) of the sample and recaptures (one or more) were required in 31.3% (10/32). Valve depth was noted at the septal side as well as a mean of the septal and non-septal sides; 68.8% (22/32) of the cohort had a mean valve implantation depth (defined as [septal side+non-septal side]/2) of at least 6 mm.

BASELINE ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL-SPECIFIC PARAMETERS

From an electrophysiological perspective, almost half were dependent on pacing during the procedure. Complete heart block made up 65.6% (21/32) of the indications for PPM insertion. Baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities captured preprocedurally included baseline left anterior fascicular block (40.6%), baseline first-degree heart block (37.5%) and baseline right bundle branch block (31.3%). A total of 40.6% (13/32) were on either AV nodal blocking or anti-arrhythmic medications prior to the procedure. Dual-chamber devices were sited in 71.9% (23/32) and 21.9% had ventricular pacing thresholds of greater than 0.7V. All but five out of 32 RV leads were sited either in the septum or right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT).

ONE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OUTCOMES

Of those who had PPM insertions within a month after TAVI, 41% (13/32) were not PPM dependent at one year.

Of all the structural parameters, a mean valve implantation depth ([septal side+non-septal side]/2) of 6.0 mm or more had a statistically significant association with PPM dependence at one year (OR 6.222 [95% CI: 1.200-2.273]; p=0.030). Equally there was a trend towards PPM dependence with a valve size of greater than 26 mm, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 3.214 [95% CI: 0.682-15.159]; p=0.140).

In terms of electrophysiological parameters, intraoperative PPM dependence (OR 5.714 [95% CI: 1.163-28.070]; p=0.032) and complete heart block as indication for PPM (OR 8.533 [95% CI: 1.616-45.063]; p=0.012) had statistically significant associations with PPM dependence at one year (Table 1).

Discussion

Our retrospective analysis of a ten-year period of PPM insertions post-TAVI has uncovered a number of valuable findings.

In terms of one-year follow-up outcomes, our rate of PPM dependence at one year of 59% echoes the rates observed in larger registry datasets, where up to 50% of those with a PPM inserted within one month after TAVI are no longer PPM dependent5,6. The consistency of this finding across registries would suggest that there may be an element of reversible, acute conduction system blockade which then improves gradually over time. This temporary insult may well be either ischaemic (in cases of coronary artery ostial occlusion) or mechanical9.

Indeed, the possibility of a predominantly mechanical mode of injury to the conducting system is supported by our finding of mean valve implantation depth being statistically significantly associated with PPM dependence at one year. Although implantation depth can be underestimated, as there is variability depending on the radiographic projection at the time of the aortogram, it provides a real-time, practical solution for the operators to guide discharge planning. Anatomically, the proximity of the left bundle branch of the His bundle to the right and non-coronary cusps makes the notion of a more deeply implanted valve causing impingement of the conducting system entirely plausible (either directly or by local myocardial oedema)10. Our finding is supported elsewhere in the literature – where not only valve implantation depth but also length of the membranous septum have been noted as predictors for high-degree AV block and need for PPM10,11,12. Specifically, there is also literature to support the use of mean valve implantation depth rather than depth at any specific coronary cusp as a potential predictor for PPM requirement13.

The analysis of our electrophysiological parameters highlighted the significance of the intraoperative PPM requirement and the presence of complete heart block as predictors of PPM dependence at one year. These findings may suggest that the presence of a higher degree blockade (manifested by requiring a PPM intraoperatively or developing CHB) rather than a more temporary AV node level lesion (for example, represented by a transient second-degree AV block) is a key driver for PPM dependence long term14. This being said, it remains difficult to ascertain whether a post-TAVI conduction disturbance will persist or self-resolve. In 2017, Tovia-Brodie et al attempted to find further predictors for PPM requirement with electrophysiology studies but were only able to garner similar findings to our study, whereby intraprocedural complete AV block and post-procedure high-grade AV block remained the only clear predictors. Use of electrophysiology studies (EPS) and, specifically, use of serial measurements of the His-Ventricular (HV) interval have yielded mixed results in terms of predicting the need for PPM in a number of small studies15,16,17.

Limitations

The limitations of our analysis include the limited sample size over the pre-specified ten-year period analysed as well as the definition and nature of PPM dependence. It is recognised that PPM dependence can be a variable phenomenon which fluctuates over time6. As such, a patient may well have significant conducting system disease which is not captured by our analysis as they do not appear to meet any of the criteria for dependence at the time of device interrogation. One could go on to speculate that the phenomenon of unexplained sudden deaths after TAVI may represent those with intermittent conducting system disease who are not recognised in the immediate post-operative phase. In addition, we recognise that using an endpoint of PPM dependence does not necessarily correlate to whether a PPM was appropriate for the same reasons noted above regarding the intermittent nature of PPM dependence. Indeed, the PPM which prevents our typically older and more comorbid TAVI patients from having a bradyarrhythmia-induced fall would be completely justified.

Future directions may include forms of electrophysiological testing beyond assessments of the HV interval, such as using rapid atrial pacing to detect Wenckebach physiology in the AV node, as this may serve as a predictor for PPM requirement as suggested by the work done by Krishnaswamy et al (2020)18. Equally, the use of implantable loop recorders after TAVI in selected higher-risk patients has shown promise in identifying those with post-TAVI late-onset conduction disturbances19. Furthermore, given the significant rates of those who do not appear to be PPM dependent at one year, consideration could be given to the use of pacing devices which could be implanted semi-permanently and then removed at a later point once it is clear that the conduction system has completely recovered.

In addition, as experience grows and valve technologies adapt, refinements in valve implantation depth as well recognition of key risk factors will continue to play a part in reducing rates of post-TAVI PPM requirement. Just as industry and clinicians have moved to reduce rates of paravalvular leak, the next frontier in improving TAVI outcomes will undoubtedly turn the focus onto post-procedural PPM requirement.

Conclusions

In keeping with other larger registry datasets, 41% of our cohort were not PPM dependent at one year. In this small retrospective analysis, mean valve implantation depth, PPM dependence during TAVI and complete heart block as indication for PPM insertion were predictors of PPM dependence at one year – all those PPM-dependent at one year in this cohort had at least one of these predictors. Larger studies with collaboration between structural and electrophysiology subspecialties are required to glean further insights into and improve rates of post-TAVI PPM requirement and dependence in order to continue to allow TAVI to evolve as a safe and reproducible intervention for aortic stenosis.

Impact on daily practice

The findings from this 10-year, single-centre, retrospective analysis will help clinicians identify patients who are not only at highest risk for requiring post-TAVI pacemaker insertion but also those who are most likely to be dependent in the long term on their pacemaker. Ultimately, this can help TAVI operators risk stratify patients based on measurable structural and electrophysiological parameters.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Share

References

  • Chamandi C, Barbanti M, Munoz-Garcia A, Latib A, Nombela-Franco L, Gutiérrez-Ibanez E, Veiga-Fernandez G, Cheema AN, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Serra V, Tamburino C, Mangieri A, Colombo A, Jiménez-Quevedo P, Elizaga J, Laughlin G, Lee DH, Garcia Del Blanco B, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Marsal JR, Côté M, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:301-10
  • Fadahunsi OO, Olowoyeye A, Ukaigwe A, Li Z, Vora AN, Vemulapalli S, Elgin E, Donato A. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Analysis From the U.S. Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:2189-99
  • Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C, Muñoz-García AJ, Cheema A, Dager AE, Serra V, Amat-Santos IJ, Barbanti M, Immè S, Briales JH, Benitez LM, Al Lawati H, Cucalon AM, García Del Blanco B, López J, Dumont E, Delarochellière R, Ribeiro HB, Nombela-Franco L, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation 2014;129:1233-43
  • Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT, Xu K, Babaliaros V, Douglas PS, El-Chami MF, Herrmann HC, Mack M, Makkar RR, Miller DC, Pichard A, Tuzcu EM, Szeto WY, Webb JG, Moses JW, Smith CR, Williams MR, Leon MB, Kodali SK; PARTNER Publications Office. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:60-9
  • Regueiro A, Abdul-Jawad Altisent O, Del Trigo M, Campelo-Parada F, Puri R, Urena M, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block and Periprocedural Pacemaker Implantation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:e003635
  • Meduri CU, Kereiakes DJ, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, O’Hair D, Linke A, Waksman R, Babliaros V, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Schindler J, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT, Feldman TE, Reardon MJ. Pacemaker Implantation and Dependency After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the REPRISE III Trial. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e012594
  • Foo FS, Lee M, Heaven D, Lever N, Sinclair S, Stiles MK, Harding S, Boddington D, Larsen P, Jackson R, Kerr AJ. Completeness of ANZACS-QI Cardiac Implanted DEVICE Registry and agreement with national datasets: ANZACS-QI 30. N Z Med J 2019;132:40-9
  • National Health Committee, Wellington, New Zealand. Aortic Stenosis: Tier 2 Overview. National Health Committee. PO Box 5013, Wellington, New Zealand. https://www.moh.govt.nz › notebook › nbbooks.nsf (last accessed 30/10/2021)
  • Toggweiler S, Kobza R. Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve: why is this still happening? J Thorac Dis 2018;10:S3614-9
  • Hamdan A, Guetta V, Klempfner R, Konen E, Raanani E, Glikson M, Goitein O, Segev A, Barbash I, Fefer P, Spiegelstein D, Goldenberg I, Schwammenthal E. Inverse Relationship Between Membranous Septal Length and the Risk of Atrioventricular Block in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:1218-28
  • Maeno Y, Abramowitz Y, Kawamori H, Kazuno Y, Kubo S, Takahashi N, Mangat G, Okuyama K, Kashif M, Chakravarty T, Nakamura M, Cheng W, Friedman J, Berman D, Makkar RR, Jilaihawi H. A Highly Predictive Risk Model for Pacemaker Implantation After TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:1139-47
  • Husser O, Pellegrini C, Kessler T, Burgdorf C, Thaller H, Mayr NP, Kasel AM, Kastrati A, Schunkert H, Hengstenberg C. Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantations and New-Onset Conduction Abnormalities With the SAPIEN 3 Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:244-54
  • Lenders GD, Collas V, Hernandez JM, Legrand V, Danenberg HD, den Heijer P, Rodrigus IE, Paelinck BP, Vrints CJ, Bosmans JM. Depth of valve implantation, conduction disturbances and pacemaker implantation with CoreValve and CoreValve Accutrak system for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation, a multi-center study. Int J Cardiol 2014;176:771-5
  • Tovia-Brodie O, Michowitz Y, Belhassen B. Use of Electrophysiological Studies in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Arrhythm Eltrophysiol Rev 2020;9:20-7
  • Tovia-Brodie O, Ben-Haim Y, Joffe E, Finkelstein A, Glick A, Rosso R, Belhassen B, Michowitz Y. The value of electrophysiologic study in decision-making regarding the need for pacemaker implantation after TAVI. J Interv Car Electrophysiol 2017;48:121-30
  • Rogers T, Devraj M, Thomaides A, Steinvil A, Lipinski MJ, Buchanan KD, Alraies MC, Koifman E, Gai J, Torguson R, Okubagzi P, Ben-Dor I, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Waksman R. Utility of Invasive Electrophysiology Studies In Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol 2018;121:1351-7
  • Makki N, Dollery J, Jones D, Crestanello J, Lilly S. Conduction disturbances after TAVR: Electrophysiological studies and pacemaker dependency. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2017;18:S10-3
  • Krishnaswamy A, Sammour Y, Mangieri A, Kadri A, Karrthik A, Banerjee K, Kaur M, Giannini F, Pagliaro B, Ancona M, Pagnesi M, Laricchia A, Weisz G, Lyden M, Bazarbashi N, Gad M, Ahuja K, Mich S, Svensson L, Puri R, Reed G, Rickard J, Colombo A, Kapadia S, Latib A. The Utility of Rapid Atrial Pacing Immediately Post-TAVR to Predict the Need for Pacemaker Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2020;13:1046-54
  • Rodés-Cabau J, Urena M, Nombela-Franco L, Amat-Santos I, Kleiman N, Munoz-Garcia A, Atienza F, Serra V, Deyell MW, Veiga-Fernandez G, Masson J, Canadas-Godoy V, Himbert D, Castrodeza J, Elizaga J, Pascual JF, Webb JG, de la Torre JM, Asmarats L, Pelletier-Beaumont E, Philippon F. Arrhythmic Burden as Determined by Ambulatory Continuous Cardiac Monitoring in Patients With New-Onset Persistent Left Bundle Branch Block Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The MARE Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:1495-505

Volume 7 - Number 2

View full issue

Download this article
Keywords
  • aortic stenosis
  • atrioventricular block
  • TAVI
Authors
  • Faeez Mohamad Ali
  • Lance Ng
  • Rajesh K Nair
  • Sanjeevan Pasupati
AsiaIntervention
  • Readers
    • Archives
    • Subscribe to the newsletter
    • Contact us
  • About the journal
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Masthead
  • Services
    • Advertising in AsiaIntervention
    • Article reprints
    • Publication calendar
    • Rights & Permissions
  • Authors
    • Authors guidelines
    • Submit your paper
  • Legal
    • Disclaimer
    • Cookies Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Legal Notice
  • Follow us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
Online ISSN 2491-0929 - Print ISSN 2426-3958
© 2015-2023 Europa Group - All rights reserved