Skip to content
The reference academic journal by and for the Asia-Pacific interventional cardiology community
AsiaIntervention

AsiaIntervention

  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • How to submit
    • Authors guidelines
    • Submit your paper
  • Services
    • Advertising
    • Article reprints
    • Publication calendar
    • Rights & Permissions
  • About the journal
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Masthead
  • Contact us
Volume 8 – Number 2

Accurate sizing of bicuspid valves for TAVR – where do we draw the line?

AsiaIntervention 2022;8:71-73 | 10.4244/AIJ-E-22-00005

Ramesh Daggubati1, MD; Mouhamed Amr Sabouni2, MD; Yasar Sattar1, MD

1. Department of Cardiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA; 2. Department of Medicine, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy poses challenges to operators in the preprocedural, procedural, and post-procedural decision making during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Randomised clinical trials have generally excluded BAV patients so more data are needed to achieve optimal results with TAVR in this context1. The orifice of the aortic valve in BAV is elliptical/supra-annular in geometry and is smaller than the annulus in size. Calcification of the aortic root and the slit-like elliptical orifices associated with BAV can impose greater aortic angulation and make delineation of the anatomical geometry of the heart valve and the aortic root difficult, thereby posing a risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch or paravalvular leak (PVL)2. All the aforementioned risk factors raise the important concept of sizing the TAVR valve for BAV patients based on the supra-annular rather than the annular plane3. A simplified outline of the mechanism of PVL after TAVR and the methods used to size transcatheter heart valves (THV) is provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Methods for sizing TAVR valves, and the common mechanism of paravalvular leak in the setting of TAVR. TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement

In this issue of AsiaIntervention, a cohort study by Beneduce et al4 proposed a novel method of sizing TAVR valves with a focus on raphe-type BAV preconfirmed by multimodal computed tomography (CT) scan. The authors reported a highly accurate way of sizing THV by measuring the size of the valve at the supra-annular level of implantation at the raphe (LIRA) plane rather than at the annular plane. This proposed method aims to decrease the amount of PVL associated with BAV TAVR. Beneduce et al focused mainly on the new self-expanding TAVR prosthesis, the ACURATE neo2 in their study. Iannopollo et al also previously described the supra-annular sizing method in a larger cohort of patients, where they achieved ideal outcomes5. Supra-annular sizing for THV using the LIRA method has also been reported in BAV with aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis67.

The study by Beneduce et al followed preoperative and intraoperative requisites for THV in BAV with raphe and demonstrated that the LIRA method is better for accurate sizing of THV, with the authors reporting 100% efficacy in preventing moderate to severe PVL in BAV. THV size is smaller using the LIRA method than using the virtual basal ring (VBR) plane. However, the sample size reported in the study was small and there was no comparison group to enable definitive conclusions. Furthermore, the follow-up period was only 30 days. THV sizing using the LIRA method in BAV resulted in more stable anchoring and sealing of the valve with an acceptable mean gradient of less than 20 mmHg.

There are several important questions that we need further data to answer in the future. Are we creating a degree of patient-prosthesis mismatch which needs a longer follow-up period to be detectable?8. Can we achieve the same results of eliminating PVL in BAV patients by routine post-deployment ballooning? Does the outcome in BAV sizing vary with different types of TAVR prostheses? How accurate is the LIRA method for BAV sizing with changes in body surface area or aortic angle? Is there a direct association between the high complication rate up to 30 days and the undersizing of THV9? Cardiovascular outcomes based on the different prosthetic types used in TAVR, and those linked to the indexed effective orifice area of such prostheses matched to body surface area, need to be highlighted in future clinical trials.

This is the beginning of a new era for BAV TAVR, in terms of a focus on reduction of complications. A randomised clinical trial with longer follow-up is required in order to draw more extensive guidelines for the accurate sizing of TAVR valves and to draw any conclusions regarding such an important challenge in the TAVR era.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Share

References

  • Tchetche D, de Biase C, van Gils L, Parma R, Ochala A, Lefevre T, Hovasse T, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Bleiziffer S, Lange R, Kornowski R, Landes U, Norgaard BL, Biasco L, Philippart R, Molina-Martin de Nicolas J, Mylotte D, Lemee C, Dumonteil N, Van Mieghem NM. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:e007107
  • Kong WKF, Delgado V, Bax JJ. Bicuspid Aortic Valve: What to Image in Patients Considered for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:e005987
  • Zegdi R, Ciobotaru V, Noghin M, Sleilaty G, Lafont A, Latrémouille C, Deloche A, Fabiani JN. Is it reasonable to treat all calcified stenotic aortic valves with a valved stent? Results from a human anatomic study in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:579-84
  • Beneduce A, Russo F, Ghizzoni G, Romano V, Ancona MB, Bellini B, Ferri L, Vella C, Iannopollo G, Palmisano A, Esposito A, Montorfano M. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in raphe-type bicuspid valves with the ACURATE neo2 according to the LIRA method. AsiaIntervention 2022;8:???-???
  • Iannopollo G, Romano V, Buzzatti N, Ancona M, Ferri L, Russo F, Bellini B, Granada JF, Chieffo A, Montorfano M. Supra-annular sizing of transcatheter aortic valve prostheses in raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve disease: the LIRA method. Int J Cardiol 2020;317:144-51
  • Iannopollo G, Romano V, Buzzatti N, De Backer O, Søndergaard L, Merkely B, Prendergast BD, Giannini F, Colombo A, Latib A, Granada JF, Chieffo A, Montorfano M. A novel supra-annular plane to predict TAVI prosthesis anchoring in raphe-type bicuspid aortic valve disease: the LIRA plane. EuroIntervention 2020;16:259-61
  • Bellini B, Iannopollo G, Buzzatti N, Romano V, Melillo F, Ancona MB, Vella C, Ferri L, Russo F, Montorfano M. TAVR in Bicuspid Valve With Pure Aortic Regurgitation: Prosthesis Sizing According to the LIRA Method. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021;14:e263-5
  • León Del Pino MDC, Ruíz Ortiz M, Delgado Ortega M, Sánchez Fernández J, Ferreiro Quero C, Durán Jiménez E, Romero Moreno M, Segura Saint-Gerons J, Ojeda Pineda S, Pan Álvarez-Ossorio M, Mesa Rubio D. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prevalence and medium term prognostic impact. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;35:827-36
  • Abdelghani M, Mankerious N, Allali A, Landt M, Kaur J, Sulimov DS, Merten C, Sachse S, Mehilli J, Neumann FJ, Frerker C, Kurz T, El-Mawardy M, Richardt G, Abdel-Wahab M. Bioprosthetic Valve Performance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Large Versus Small Aortic Valve Annuli: Insights From the CHOICE Trial and the CHOICE-Extend Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018;11:2507-18

Volume 8 - Number 2

View full issue

Download this article
Authors
  • Mouhamed Amr Sabouni
  • Ramesh Daggubati
  • Yasar Sattar
AsiaIntervention
  • Readers
    • Archives
    • Subscribe to the newsletter
    • Contact us
  • About the journal
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Masthead
  • Services
    • Advertising in AsiaIntervention
    • Article reprints
    • Publication calendar
    • Rights & Permissions
  • Authors
    • Authors guidelines
    • Submit your paper
  • Legal
    • Disclaimer
    • Cookies Policy
    • Privacy Policy
    • Legal Notice
  • Follow us
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
Online ISSN 2491-0929 - Print ISSN 2426-3958
© 2015-2023 Europa Group - All rights reserved